Trina Joy Thornhill©, living woman, acting in defence of her daughter:

March 2022 court documents were sent via registered mail without signature to living woman Trina Joy Thornhill© by Respondent/Debtor Devon Williams (the ex). In these documents from the Respondent/Debtor wanted to through a motion to change, force vaccinate both living daughters without consent, force both living daughters to enter into public corporation of education without consent, force both living daughters who were fearful of the respondent/debtor (father) to resume access without consent, to change custody agreement from sole custody Trina Joy Thornhill© to shared, as well as make changes to mandated support. 

The intent of the Respondent/Debtor Devon Williams was malicious in nature, as the use of forced vaccinations was to be used as coercion to force both living daughters to place themselves into an unsafe, fearful situation. This was used as coercion trying to force the hand of Trina Joy Thornhill© to sacrifice her living daughters against their will. Both living daughters experienced reactions to infant vaccinations which resulted in anaphylaxis, vomiting, loss of consciousness, seizures, the inability to eat, loss of breathing, loss of bowel function and neurological challenges. All events the Respondent/Debtor Devon Williams, was aware of and witnessed. Using criminal coercion, he failed to comply with the living daughter’s common law rights as well as Trina Joy Thornhill©, under the Universal Declaration Human Rights 1948 and statutory legislation. 

As the Respondent/Debtor who was a Peel Police Officer cannot claim ignorance of the law, his behaviour can only be described as negligent and criminal. The Respondent/Debtor has threatened Trina Joy Thornhill© with loss of life and shared where he could dispose of her body. This was reported and the current court systems failed in all aspects to hold Respondent/Debtor responsible. The Respondent/Debtor has made threats of similar nature to the living daughters, fallen asleep behind the wheel with the living daughters in the car, and other events placing the living daughters at risk. The Respondent/Debtor has acted with bias, fraudulently and ultra vires, not to mention that he is guilty of using criminal coercion, the crimes of uttering, as well as exposed the children to pornographic material, placed them in danger. 

March 28, 2022 Trina Joy Thornhill© eldest living daughter was killed by the corporation Sick Kids, after being forced into cancer treatment against her will. The Corporation of Ontario enables the medical establishment to have a license to kill. Trina Joy Thornhill© only discovered the Common Law Court annulled the Cancer ACt of 1939, May 27, 2019. The deceased living daughter went to her death fearful of Respondent/Debtor so much so she did not want him to see her even at her death.

May 2022 Trina Joy Thornhill© filed a UCC1 Financial statement. A package containing the following were included in those documents, Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement, Certificate of Annexures, Copyright Notice for both Trina Joy Thornhill© and last living daughter Ashlyne Jaimie Williams©, Affidavit of Non-Corporate Status, Rescinding of Signatures, Security Agreement, Affidavit of Truth, 12 Presumptions of Court, Cestui Vie 1666, and Cestui Vie 1748. At the same time The following document was sent into the Supreme Court Justice in May, 2022 to be add to the case number FS-22-0012-00. This document and all correspondence also made public record. Last communication with the courts June 29th, 2022, they were notified Trina Joy Thornhill© or any variation of that name reserve all rights and waive none. Trina Joy Thornhill© or any variation of that name do not consent to any contracts or implied contracts, or to any presumptions or assumptions to enter into any contract with THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, PEEL REGION or any COURTS within their jurisdictional control. 

—————————————— 

Submission Regarding case number FS-22-0012-00, 

Trina Joy Thornhill© will henceforth be referred to as Secured Party Creditor by the courts as they do not have permission to use the copyrighted name or any of its variations. Any use of Trina Joy Thornhill© on any documentation will be invoiced at a rate of $200,000.00 per use. 

I am submitting evidence that Devon Williams (Respondent/debtor) has a history of rape allegation and has engaged in several instances of crimes of a sexual nature involving my daughters Ashlyne© and McKenzie©, who the court may refer to as “the daughter(s) of secured party creditor”. As part of Case Number FS-22-0012-00 Devon (Respondent/debtor) is now attempting to force vaccinations on my remaining daughter with no medical or scientific evidence to show that she is in any need of vaccination, whereas I have ample proof to show

that any vaccination would be a direct threat to the health and safety of Ashlyne© that could very well lead to her death. As well Devon Williams (Respondent/debtor) is looking to force Ashlyne© to see him, after he both threatened, intimidated, coerced, both children making them fearful for their safety, as well as fearful over losing rights to control over what is permitted or not permitted in their bodies. My evidence and expertise was ignored when I told Sick Kids that their unnecessary treatment of McKenzie’s© misdiagnosed illness would eventually kill her, and it did on March 28, 2022 of this year. Ashlyne© will not suffer the same fate. 

The lawyer Andre Lozano of the LOZANO PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION was the lawyer hired by me for this case, until Monday May 9th 2022, where he was fired for poor professional conduct, misfiling Affidavits on 2 occasions, intimidation, fraudulent accusations and failure to allow documents from my daughters to be entered into her file for her defense. 

Upon receiving this evidence it is now the duty of the court to enforce an investigation into the criminality of Devon (Respondent/debtor), especially as a former Peel police officer who lost his position due to an instance where he was accused of raping a woman while off duty and was placed on desk duty where eventually he was relieved of his job. Failure to take this evidence seriously would make the courts complicit in the crimes. Ashlyne© has also made it clear that she wants absolutely nothing to do with her father and I will ensure that my daughter’s wishes are fulfilled and she is kept safe. You will find her testimony enclosed as well. Ashlyne© has specifically told me and her father that she doesn’t want anything to do with vaccinations as it is her body and if she can consent to take a medical procedure without parental consent, she can decline. 

Here are some of the criminal code offenses of which I will be presenting the evidence to the court and the police: 

Criminal Code of Canada 

490.011 (1) The following definitions apply in this section and in sections 490.012 to 490.032.

crime of a sexual nature means a crime referred to in subsection 3(2) of the Sex Offender Information Registration Act. (crimes de nature sexuelle) 

database has the same meaning as in subsection 3(1) of the Sex Offender Information Registration Act. (banque de données) 

designated offense means 

(a) an offense under any of the following provisions: 

(i) subsection 7(4.1) (offence in relation to sexual offences against children), (ix.1) section 171.1 (making sexually explicit material available to child) 

(i.1) subsection 173(1) (indecent acts), 

If injury or damage feared 

810 (1) An information may be laid before a justice by or on behalf of any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person 

(a) will cause personal injury to them or to their intimate partner or child or will damage their property; or

(b) will commit an offense under section 162.1. 

Intimidation 

423 (1) Everyone is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an offense punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from doing, 

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or their intimate partner or children, or injures the person’s property; 

(b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be damaged; 

(c) persistently follows that person; 

(d) hides any tools, clothes or other property owned or used by that person, or deprives him or her of them or hinders him or her in the use of them; 

(e) with one or more other persons, follows that person, in a disorderly manner, on a highway; 

(f) besets or watches the place where that person resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or

(g) blocks or obstructs a highway. 

Criminal harassment 

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-264.html 

264 (1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. 

Marginal note:Prohibited conduct 

(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of 

(a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them; 

(b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them; 

(c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or 

(d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.

Criminal negligence 

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-219.html 219 (1) Everyone is criminally negligent who 

(a) in doing anything, or 

(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do, 

shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons. Assault https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-265.html 265 (1) A person commits an assault when

(a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly; 

(b) he attempts or threatens, by an act or a gesture, to apply force to another person, if he has, or causes that other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose; or 

(c) while openly wearing or carrying a weapon or an imitation thereof, he accosts or impedes another person or begs. 

Consent 

(3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of 

(a) the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; 

(b) threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; 

(c) fraud; or

(d) the exercise of authority. 

Uttering threats https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-264.1.html 

264.1 (1) Everyone commits an offense who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat 

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; 

(b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or 

(c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. 

Unlawfully causing bodily harm 

https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-57.html#docCont

“269 Every one who unlawfully causes bodily harm to any person is guilty of (a) an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or (b) an offense punishable on summary conviction.” 

Torture https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-57.html#docCont 

“269.1 (1) Every official, or every person acting at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of an official, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

torture means any act or omission by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person 

(a) for a purpose including 

(i) obtaining from the person or from a third person information or a statement, 

(ii) punishing the person for an act that the person or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, and 

(iii) intimidating or coercing the person or a third person, or 

(b) for any reason based on discrimination of any kind,

but does not include any act or omission arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions. (torture)” 

Extortion https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-346.html 

“346 (1) Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.” 

Intimidation https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-423.html 

“423 (1) Everyone is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an offense punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from doing,

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or their intimate partner or children, or injures the person’s property; 

(b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be damaged; 

(c) persistently follows that person; 

(d) hides any tools, clothes or other property owned or used by that person, or deprives him or her of them or hinders him or her in the use of them; 

(e) with one or more other persons, follows that person, in a disorderly manner, on a highway;

(f) besets or watches the place where that person resides, works carries on business or happens to be; or 

(g) blocks or obstructs a highway.” 

File FS-22-0012-00, Affidavit 14 A dated April 29th, 2022 Point 3 A, B, C is fraud 

A)The Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) then learned of McKenzie’s passing and asked about the funeral arrangements. At the time he called I was very emotional and explained I would get the details to him as soon as I got home as I was driving. In discussing very briefly arrangements, he said “My family and his family would be separate” I have three witnesses to the phone call. I said what do you mean and he hung up. Devon’s role with the children and myself has been of control, intimidation and threats. See Court File No 22-12 

B)Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) was contacted by phone March 28, 2022 at 5:48pm to be notified of McKenzie’s passing he did not pick up. McKenzie had told the Respondent she did not want to see him,she was afraid of him and did not want him near her. She did not want him part of her life or her death, she did not even want him at her funeral, as she and her sister 

were concerned for their safety. When she died I called to notify the Respondent who did not return my call until Tuesday March 29th 2022, at 4:35pm, almost 24 hours later. See Attached document Point 3 – B. 

1. C) Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) texted wanting to know the funeral home was this Tuesday March 29th, 2022 at 4:45pm. I had only gotten home. I replied at 5:41pm requesting if

he was planning to relocate McKenzie, which shows as read. At 6:46pm I texted again and it shows it was read, he then replied at 6:47pm. I had spoken to the funeral home over my concerns of him taking McKenzie’s body and moving her to another funeral home. They reassured me they would not let that happen. McKenzie did not want the Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) at her funeral, it was against her final wishes, with that weighing heavily on my heart which I told the Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) through text when responding to his text when seen at 7:33pm, here I provided Devon with the funeral information. 

1. D) This is false 
2. E) McKenzie told the Respondent/debtor (Devon Williams) she did not want to see him or speak with him. McKenzie and Ashlyne© were fearful, Criminal Code 810 (a), experienced intimidation, as did I Criminal Code 423, as well as criminal negligence, and assault. Feb 27th, 2022 McKenzie and Ashlyne called the Respondent/debtor to let him know they did not want to talk or see him. They had not seen him as they declined their access with the Respondent/debtor as he threatened, and used coercion, all because the children did not want to spend 2 extra days with the Respondent/debtor. Criminal Code 264.1 (1) he used threats to never see them again, for any holiday’s, birthdays, or for any reason if they did not do their 5 days visit. The Respondent being an ex- Peel Police officer had told me numerous times he was connected and that no one would believe me. When reporting porn and abuse to the Grimsby CAS as that was where we lived at the time, he was able to get the file closed, even when both children and myself told them of the threats verbal and physical, intimidation, isolation and financial hardship endured. 
3. Please see Court File No. 22-12 The Respondent/debtor had been sexually permisious and cheating during our marraige. He asked me for a divorce, he wanted me to vacate the house with the children with nowhere to go. He said we divorce and or stay married until the children are old enough and go our separate ways. By this time I had been cut off from friends and family and financially held hostage in the home. I was not permitted to use our finances and he was moving finances from one location to another without my knowledge. The Respondent/debtor at that time had been having affairs and was never home, I was sole everything to our children whom he wanted nothing to do with. Having been a stay at home mom, due to both our children having health issues.

The Respondent during our marriage, threatened to blow my face off with a gun, drove me by a bog where police knew was a common place to dump the bodies. He told me during searches this was one area known by police and criminals alike where bodies could be dumped and never found, stuff learned while policing. He informed me this is where people go missing and never found. He was always letting me know he was connected and no one would ever believe he was abusive, it would be his word against mine. I asked why he was telling me this, he just looked at me and said, so you know this is where people go and are never found. He was mentally and emotionally abusive and would call McKenzie a bitch at 2 years of age and tell her not to grow up to be a bitch like her mother. We were held hostage in the home for years as he used my car to build his sales career, and when not at work, would try hard to stay at other peoples homes between calls as he could not stand both children being unwell and the health challenges. When he traded my car in he forged my signature without my consent. 

I was incredibly beaten down, scared, and trapped with nowhere to turn and was in need of help. I was told by a friend to reach out to the West Niagara Affordable Housing in Grimsby – see letter dated March 16th, 2022. Here I met with Social Workers who after hearing the abuse reported Devon to CAS, but made sure the children and I had a safe place to go. We fled the home with the help of the West Niagara Affordable Housing Program, through an abuse women’s program. All documented in the Court File No. 22-12 

Point 5: The Respondent states that I have never tried to address porn my concerns with him regarding him exposing the children to porn,that is FALSE. Please see emails dated March 7, 2019 and June 26th, 2019. Here I addressed the concern for porn. After I married, I sadly learned he was addicted, as pre marriage I had no clue, it was never a topic of conversation, ever. Our first year married, the Respondent watched so much porn it fried the hard drive of my computer. How I learned this is I went to get the computer repaired and the technician asked me if anyone was watching porn on the computer, and I said no. I was asked who else uses my computer and I said at night when I go to bed my husband uses it for business purposes. I was told that there were so many porn linked viruses on my hard drive it was beyond repair. I was horrified. When I tried to address this matter with the Respondent he denied it. However after this he locked his phone and refused to allow me to use it after seeing him texting random women on it. When I tried to address the above with the Respondent he denied it, I tried to address this in person and he denied it and he never responded in email. 

He was also checking out children and asking my now deceased 12 year old, which one she thought was pretty and how old, and what she thought of them. He did this in the presence of

her sister as well. 2 weeks before McKenzie died due to medical malpractice she told me Respondent/debtor was always checking out young girls and it made her really uncomfortable and asked her the above. He would slow down while they drove and stare at them. While living under the same roof the Respondent/debtor would ask me if a woman on TV was too “young” for him. The women would be in their teens and early twenties. 

Point 6 – FALSE see Court File No. 22-12 

Feb 27, 2022 both children called Devon responding to his call and telling him they did not want to talk with him. During this conversation the Respondent/debtor, demeaned, used coercion and blackmail to try and get the children to see him. I was down stairs as were my parents and sister. We heard screaming as the girls were yelling at him as he told them if they did not start to see him again he would take me to court. They told him it was between him and them, and that they were afraid and did not feel safe. He would ignore them and talk over them. McKenzie was the protector of her sister and was telling him to listen and that they should have a right to choose to go or not, especially since they did not feel safe. He said “tell your mother I will see her in court, and make a judge tell you both how to act”. They begged him not to, McKenzie was crying. After getting off the phone, both girls said “Mommy I want to protect you, we will go see him, even though we are scared and do not want to.” I told them it was my job to protect them and that this was between the Respondent/debtor and myself and he should not have told him. They were terrified. McKenzie is now dead, she lost her life March 28th, 2022, she can not speak but Ashlyne© can, and will. 

Point 7 – FALSE please review emails and Court File No. 22-12 , both children cried and never wanted to go. I would get 10 to 20 calls (when the phone was allowed to be used) in a 48 hour period while in his care. He would refuse to give them access to the phone. Both children said if we don’t have rights and are forced to go, we go numb and make sure the Respondent/debtor can’t do them any harm. It was easier to be numb then no they had no voice. It is common for those in abusive situations to make the best of their situation. Coming home, many weekends it took a few days for them to feel okay and safe. Many times the Monday was a home day if possible so I could help them adjust, and calm their fears. 

Point 8 – FALSE see point 4, the Respondent/debtor also gas-lit the children and made a similar comment to them, if needed he could end their lives, and called it a joke. Both children

were devastated and confused when they came home and told me. I was well aware of Devon’s tactics as he used them on me. 

Point 9– FALSE – Respondent/debtor was ordered to wear his sleep mask after placing both children at risk via the courts He wears his mask ¼ of the allotted time he is to be wearing it. He has fallen asleep with me in the car with the children, I then refused to get into the car with him driving and did the driving when married. Please see Sept 19, 2017 with a picture. 

Point 10 – FALSE 

We moved to my sisters due to mold in the house we were renting and it was risking our health. I have a mold allergy and the landlord refused to fix the basement where the mold was very prevalent. I notified the Respondent/debtor at the time of the move and he refused to consent. 

Please see emails beginning June 9th, 2020 and Court File No. 22-12. Devon moved almost 80km outside of the Grimsby address of our original agreement and then denied me consent to move, as a result of the girl’s safety, as well as my own. 

2022. A) His true address is not known, he is having a house built in Wasaga to be ready October 2022. He has no clothing in this residence, and the children have questioned if it was where he is living. 
2023. B) Irrelevant 
2024. C) FALSE – see emails beginning June 9th, 2020 and Court File No. 22-12 

POINT 11 – The Respondent is a debtor with no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety by attempting to force vaccinate her against her will with no demonstrable scientific evidence that she is in need of these harmful medical interventions. He is aware of her and her sisters medical history and past reactions. See file FS-0012-22

provided for scientific evidence as well as see the breakdown of both children’s medical history. 

1. A) FALSE – The Respondent/debtor has never had any interest in the care of the children. Up until the time of McKenzie having this diagnosis, every health issue was relayed to the Respondent/debtor, his reply “Thank you for the update”. McKenzie being a mature minor exercised her rights under the Health Care Consent Act, as her medical files were her own. In order to get access, a parent required a signature. She did not want the Respondent/debtor to be part of her medical care. She was afraid of him, his controlling nature, intimidation, coercion and it was her right to involve who she trusted. Stress is a factor in causing any health issue to get worse, she was afraid of him. 
2. B) The Respondent is a debtor, I hold the copyright for the names Trina Joy Thornhill© as well as Ashlyne© he no longer has my express permission to use either name or any and all variations of them. – The Respondent is a debtor with no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety, by attempting to force vaccinate her against her will with no demonstrable scientific evidence that she is in need of these harmful medical interventions. 

Ashlyne© can agree to take the medical procedure without parental consent, she can decline. This is the choice of Ashlyne©, she declines and she will speak on her behalf. 

C)The Respondent is a debtor with no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety by attempting to force vaccinate her against her will with no demonstrable scientific evidence that she is in need of these harmful medical interventions. The duty is to prevent harm which she has already experienced in the past with past vaccines, which the Respondent/debtor was aware of and until this time NEVER wanted her vaccinated. 

1. D) Ashlyne© is 10 and can make the decision to vaccinate without parental consent. She can also decline what she has and she can speak for herself. It is her body, as a living daughter and she says no.

POINT 12 

1. A) FALSE Respondent/debtor has been told by both Ashlyne© and McKenzie they did not feel safe and did not want to see him. Please see emails from Ashlyne© and McKenzie telling the Respondent/debtor they did feel unsafe and did not want to see him. 
2. B) FALSE Respondent/debtor, is not truthful and fraudulent, please see emails included regarding communication as well as Court File No. 22-12. The majority of emails have no reply and were ignored. 
3. C) FALSE – Respondent/debtor waited 8 months before considering a motion. D) FALSE – 
4. E) FALSE – See Point 6 
5. F) FALSE – see Court File No. 22-12 

Point 13 – The Respondent/debtor has no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety. Ashlyne© has told Respondant/debtor she does not feel safe in his care and does not want to see him. 

1. A) The Respondent/debtor has no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety. He has abused the service of the Police in the past and used them to instill fear and intimidate all three of us, knowing he lied and that it was a family law matter.

See email Police October 14th – “17-99380 – #9600 – Landry see email Sat Oct 14, 2017

where I had to call the police as his access was temporarily suspended due to risking Ashlyne© and McKenzie’s health while falling asleep behind the wheel. The Police stressed if I let those children continue to go in the Respondents Care and any harm would occur I was just as legally responsible as the Respondent/debtor. All things I knew, and valued the lives of my children over anything else. 

B)The Respondent/debtor has no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety. 

1. C) The Respondent/debtor has no claim to Ashlyne© as well as being a direct threat to her health and safety, in addition Respondent/debtor has no claim over myself and my ability to travel. 

Point 14 – see point 11A 

Point 15 – The Respondent/debtor has placed both McKenzie and Ashlyne© in harm’s way. The emails and testimony of both children show a pattern of coercion, fear, intimidation, crime of sexual manner, criminal harassment, criminal negligence and threats. 

The Court needs to take these matters seriously or be complicit in the above crimes. BY ORDER OF TRINA JOY THORNHILL© byTrina Joy Thornhill©